A Biography of US Senator Rand Paul

A Biography of US Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul is a Republican United States Senator from Kentucky with traditionalist libertarian see focuses, and the child of previous Congressman and customary presidential competitor Ron Paul. An eye specialist by profession, Paul has been hitched to his significant other, Kelly, since 1990 and together they have three children. While Paul has restricted political history, he was a successive campaigner for his dad and furthermore the author of a genius citizen bunch in Kentucky, Kentucky Taxpayers United. Appointive History: Rand Paul has a restricted political history and didn't make a pursue political position until 2010. In spite of the fact that he began as a twofold digit dark horse to Trey Grayson in the GOP essential, Paul exploited the rebellious opinion inside the Republican Party and was one of some since quite a while ago shot untouchables to remove GOP-sponsored applicants. With the support of the casual get-together, Paul proceeded to crush Grayson 59-35%. Democrats accepted they had a better than average possibility in the general political race against Paul because of his absence of political experience. They party picked the genuinely well known state Attorney General, Jack Conway. Despite the fact that Conway drove in early surveying, Paul proceeded to win by a genuinely agreeable 12 focuses. Paul was sponsored by most moderates and casual get-together gatherings, including Jim DeMint and Sarah Palin. Political Positions: Rand Paul is a moderate libertarian who is ideologically-lined up with his dad, Ron Paul, in general. Paul is firmly for states rights in general and he accepts that the government should just administer where it is naturally approved to do as such. He accepts hot-button issues, for example, gay marriage and cannabis sanctioning ought to be up for each state to choose, which likewise is by all accounts a rising assessment inside the preservationist development. Paul has likewise been a significant figure in minority outreach and a significant defender of criminal equity change. Rand Paul is genius life, which is maybe where he digresses most from the bigger libertarian development. He restricts government subsidizing of nearly everything, including fetus removal, training, human services and other extra-protected issues that are intended to be dealt with by every individual state. The primary region of worry for moderates with respect to Paul is on international strategy. While Paul is plainly on the less interventionist and less dissident size of international strategy, he isn't exactly the fanatic his dad was on the issue. He is firmly contradicted to NSA spying programs. 2016 Presidential Run: Getting back on track, Rand Paul reported a run for the 2016 GOP selection for President. While he began with tolerable numbers, his ubiquity accepting a plunge as he endured a bunch of poor discussion exhibitions. While his dad regularly involved the wild outsider job in presidential races, Rand Pauls increasingly estimated approach really appears to have harmed him. The anarchistic group floated away from the Ron Paul/Rand Paul side and over to Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, both who have out-moved Paul. His international strategy sees have likewise become a risk as the Republican Party has moved back to a progressively hawkish position following the off-hands approach of the Obama White House. This has prompted the incidental to and fro among Paul and individual contender Marco Rubio, who has regularly came out to improve things. Monetarily, the Paul crusade has battled and it has stayed in the base crosspiece of applicants. His surveying has likewise slacked, and he has continually attempted to stay over the discussion limit. A few Republicans have called for Paul to abandon the race and rather center around his 2016 Senate run as they dread he is squandering important assets while harming his own fame.

Censorship and Banning Books essays

Restriction and Banning Books papers After some time at some point, there has been issues about right to speak freely and restriction. I accept that there are scarce differences to where there ought to be oversight, however not in all instances of what we see, read, or hear in regular day to day existence. Books ought not be restricted in light of the fact that it conflicts with everything that our nation was established for, opportunity to be what you need to be, to peruse what you need to peruse, and state anything you desire to state. I feel that I ought not be determined what to peruse and what not to peruse. Individuals need to have an independent perspective and not let others settle on choices for them. Question Authority. Contemplate what individuals instruct you to do. Do you feel it is correct? Utilize your own judgment admirably. At that point close your own assessments on what you are told. The primary explanation books are prohibited from schools is a result of sexual substance, utilization of irreverence, or the manner in which the book may impact you. Individuals in our general public today ought to be sufficiently astute to think by what they see and not by what they hear. Restriction could be characterized as any individual or a gathering of people attempting to force their ethical quality on all of society all in all. While its significant that we live in an ethical society, the degree of profound quality would be set up normally by and through the conclusions on society overall. Not by any individual or little gathering. Our nation was established, there was something written in the Constitution called the First Amendment. The First Amendment gives us the opportunity we need to think, see, talk, hear, and so forth what we need to observe. Prohibiting books removes that opportunity of the Constitution. The primary motivation behind books are to instruct. In the event that the book doesn't fill that need, odds are it wont be utilized by any stretch of the imagination. Society ought not so much be worried about books with no reclaiming esteem being utilized in schools. On the off chance that they have no an incentive to them, odds are they won't be utilized. Individuals need to show signs of improvement comprehension of things and th... <! Oversight and Banning Books papers After some time at some point, there has been issues about right to speak freely and control. I accept that there are almost negligible differences to where there ought to be control, however not in all instances of what we see, read, or hear in regular daily existence. Books ought not be prohibited in light of the fact that it conflicts with everything that our nation was established for, opportunity to be what you need to be, to peruse what you need to peruse, and state anything you desire to state. I feel that I ought not be determined what to peruse and what not to peruse. Individuals need to have an independent perspective and not let others settle on choices for them. Question Authority. Contemplate what individuals advise you to do. Do you feel it is correct? Utilize your own judgment admirably. At that point finish up your own sentiments on what you are told. The fundamental explanation books are prohibited from schools is a direct result of sexual substance, utilization of foulness, or the manner in which the book may impact you. Individuals in our general public today ought to be sufficiently shrewd to think by what they see and not by what they hear. Control could be characterized as any individual or a gathering of people attempting to force their profound quality on all of society all in all. While its significant that we live in an ethical society, the degree of profound quality would be built up normally by and through the suppositions on society in general. Not by any individual or little gathering. Our nation was established, there was something written in the Constitution called the First Amendment. The First Amendment gives us the opportunity we need to think, see, talk, hear, and so on what we need to observe. Prohibiting books removes that opportunity of the Constitution. The fundamental motivation behind books are to teach. In the event that the book doesn't fill that need, odds are it wont be utilized by any stretch of the imagination. Society ought not so much be worried about books with no reclaiming esteem being utilized in schools. On the off chance that they have no an incentive to them, odds are they won't be utilized. Individuals need to show signs of improvement comprehension of things and th... <!

Alcohol in College Scotland and the US

Alcohol in College Scotland and the US What the Americans can teach the Scots about drinking In todays The Sunday Times, one of the United Kingdoms most respected newspapers, rising MIT sophomore Grace Kane 11, a native of Glasgow, Scotland, authors an article commenting on alcohol culture in the US and her homeland. The reason for the commentary is a proposal to clamp down on binge drinking in Scotland by people under the age of 21, though the legal drinking age is 18. You can read about it here, but the basic story is: Proposals to tackle Scotlands binge-drinking culture have been announced by the Scottish Government. The plan would see anyone under the age of 21 banned from buying alcohol in off-licences and set a minimum price at which a unit of alcohol can be sold. The consultation document also proposes ending some cheap drink promotions and making some retailers help pay for the consequences of alcohol abuse. Graces article is a great read, and not only because it is fun to see British terms like Freshers week. It is very interesting to see the American (and MIT) college social life from a different perspective. Check it out: From The Sunday Times June 22, 2008 What the Americans can teach the Scots about drinking Grace Kane 11 Freshers week means just one thing for most first-year students â€" a big, happy cloud of collective inebriation. I was one of those new students last September, but while my former school friends enjoyed discount vodka shots in the union bars of Britain, I was 2,000 miles away, building a robot. I was in the middle of “freshman orientation week” at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, in a country where the legal drinking age is 21. It was a culture shock. How would a bunch of 18- and 19-year-olds â€" particularly MIT’s infamously geeky crop of scientists and engineers â€" socialise with strangers without the help of alcohol? I had visions of sober and awkward all-American activities. Although sober, orientation week was not awkward in the least. We went sailing, toured the city, took a trip to Cape Cod, ate our weight in free food and got to raid one of the labs to build submarine robots from spare parts. I had fun and made friends that will last through college. All without the help of so much as half a bottle of Bud. So I am not one of the young Scots protesting about “demonisation” in response to proposals to stop us binge-drinking. Under the plans, alcohol will no longer be sold to under-21s in off-licences and supermarkets. There have been warnings that the measure will be extended to pubs and clubs, as in the US, forcing us all to abstain or break the law. Ross Finnie, a Liberal Democrat MSP, has written to every student union in the land warning of dark, dry days ahead. The Tories have joined Finnie and the drinks industry in wailing disapproval. In my experience, however, raising the legal age to 21 has many merits. America isn’t filled with teetotal, bored young people. Its full of young people who have other things to do. I was sceptical at first and slightly disappointed to celebrate my 18th birthday last September with cake and soda. But as my first year passed, I noticed that I seemed to have more money than my friends back home, even though we were on the same tight budget. I also had more free time, even though I had more coursework. Young people in America play more sports than here, and not just the “jock” types. Everyone has a hobby or talent â€" from fairly typical ones such as sailing, theatre and music, to extremes like skydiving and fire-breathing. A few undergraduates I know have already started their own businesses. At MIT a great deal of energy goes into complex practical jokes, called hacks, such as putting a life-size fire engine on the main building’s famous dome. Too many students in Scotland, on the other hand, just go to the pub. It sounds like the old stereotype: American enthusiasm versus British apathy. But people in the US do seem to care more about life. Perhaps this is because they spend their free time doing stuff they love, rather than using it to forget about the rest of the week. Of course, young Americans break the law and drink underage. But it’s much harder than it is at home. Teenagers in Scotland can get hold of booze so long as they have a tall, stubbly 14-year-old friend with a vaguely convincing ID card. In Boston, you need to find someone over 21 to go to a liquor store and present a Massachusetts drivers’ licence. Given the general disapproval of underage drinking, not many adults will do this. In this climate, drinking is regarded more as an occasional treat. American students will go several weeks drink-free between dorm parties, or will store beer in their cube fridges for a particularly bad day. The longer I lived in Boston, the more I realised my attitudes towards alcohol were a bit odd. American students were aghast when I told what I thought were unremarkable stories of elbowing my way through walls of drunks in a Glasgow railway station on Saturday evenings. “But it wasn’t that bad,” I’d reassure my horrified audience. “Only a few people were vomiting in the street and most of them were still walking upright.” In America lots of people will announce, “I don’t drink”, with pride. This is not to say that everyone in the US approves of the legal drinking age. A minority favour liberalisation and argue that young people would drink more responsibly if it was out in the open. They point to cases such as that of Scott Krueger, an MIT student who died of alcohol poisoning weeks after arriving at college. Schools in America have poor alcohol-awareness education, with many teaching only abstinence. Some young people drink themselves to death through sheer ignorance as soon as they get their hands on spirits. Yet despite these isolated tragedies, Americans are generally more careful about where, when and how much they imbibe. Scots, and Britons generally, do themselves more damage despite having responsible drinking messages drilled into them at school. Eventually I curbed my frustration at having to walk past Boston’s Irish bars unable to go inside for a Guinness. I stopped envying pub-crawling friends back home and started to feel I had the better deal. It helps that drink here is more expensive. I can take a day trip to New York City for the price of a bottle of Jack Daniel’s â€" it’s a no-brainer as to how I’d rather spend my Sunday. I go to see bands completely sober and enjoy them all the more. I’ve picked up random skills, such as Chinese juggling and how to construct theatre sets. More importantly, I passed courses such as multivariable calculus and relativistic electromagnetism. I had, in retrospect, a much better first year than if I was freely allowed to drink. So I say to the under-21s in Scotland: don’t be too scared of a drinking ban, even one that goes “all the way”. You might save money, go to new places, find out what Sunday mornings look like. Or at least, get something more out of the next few years than a million drunken photos on Facebook and a slightly degraded liver. Grace Kane from Glasgow is studying mechanical and ocean engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Thermos And Thermodynamics Physics - 971 Words

The Thermos and Thermodynamics Physics around Campus Phoebe Seaver Physics 102 Spring 2017 In the photo, we see two coffee cups, one that is in an insulated thermos with a lid, and one that is a regular mug open to the air, on a college student’s desk at home during their finals studying. It is well known that as coffee sits in any container, it cools down towards room temperature, making it less tasty to drink once it gets lukewarm or even room temperature. However, if it is too hot, it can burn the drinkers tongue and throat, which is incredibly painful, speaking from experience. The rate at which coffee cools may not seem like a science, but in fact, this plays into the laws of thermodynamics that are present in†¦show more content†¦Often, energy is lost to the surroundings, and not directly transferred from one object to the other. However, a perfect thermos would prevent any heat from leaking out or in. Energy in the form of heat can flow between materials inside the thermos to the extent that they have different temperatures; for example, between ice cubes and warm coffee. The transfer of energy continues until a common temperature is reached at thermal equilibrium (Cutnell 2014). Thermal equilibrium occurs when there is no heat flow between two materials, making them essentially the same temperature. This is why the coffee continues to cool down the longer it is exposed to the air, because heat exchange is occurring, and the liquid is cooling down from its original warmth to be more like the room that is it in, as the room has less heat. This is why a thermos causes the coffee to cool down slower, because the thermos provides insulation against the exchange of heat from the outside. The extra insulating layer is actually a vacuum, or absence of air, formed during the construction of the thermos. The best insulator possible is a vacuum, because there s no air. If there s no air to transfer heat, then the heat is retained where it is (wonderopolis.org). The equation for Specific Heat: . In order to cool down a stand ard 8oz cup of coffee to roomShow MoreRelatedFinding use in â€Å"spacecrafts, pacemakers, underwater systems, electric automobiles, and remote1200 Words   |  5 Pagescaptures these electrons for use to power the device connected to the battery. Now we will discuss a brief history of early atomic battery development. Henry G. J. Moseley, known for developing the Atomic Number and numerous other contributions to physics and chemistry, created the first known atomic battery in 1913 with his demonstration of the beta cell. He experimented with a radioactive isotope of the element radium, and the respective emissions of beta particles, to form the first atomic batteryRead MorePurpose For A Career In Engineering1025 Words   |  5 Pageshigh school, deeply intrigued by mechanisms and experiments in physics, I frequently took part in the State Science Exhibitions demonstrating models from solar oven to spring-mass systems. My passion for Physics and Mathematics in high school spurred me to win many awards at Manipur State Level Competitions. This led me to major in Science during Higher Secondary School. Later, it served as an impetus behind my choice of Engineering Physics as my undergraduate major at the famed National Institute ofRead MoreThe World Of Convection, Conduction, And Radiation1685 Word s   |  7 Pagesof thermodynamics involves the study of thermal processes in physical systems. Some terms involved with these particular concepts include: closed system, empirical law, free energy, joule’s law, specific, temperature, and thermodynamics. The general defined term of convection is â€Å"the heat transfer by mass motion of a fluid such as air or water when the heated fluid is caused to move away from the source of heat, carrying energy with it† (Georgia State University). â€Å"In the world of physics, theRead MoreTaking a Look at Heat Transplantation1530 Words   |  6 Pagesto learn the real meanings of those terms and how the heat is transferred from a place to place, and understand the real context of those terms in everyday life. Everyone has felt heat, but what is it? The simple answer is that heat is energy. In physics heat is identified as a source of energy and can be observed only when it is transferring from a one place to another. All matter in the universe, is made up of molecules and atoms. These atoms are always in different types of motion and this motionRead MoreEssay on Tom Stoppards Arcadia2125 Words   |  9 Pages Tom Stoppard parallels the Second Law of Thermodynamics with the human experience in his play Arcadia. The parallelism suggests truths about the evolution of science and human society, love and sexual relationships, and the physical world. The Second Law drives the formation of more complex molecular structures in our universe, the diffusion of energy, such as heat, and is inhibited by the initial energy required to unlock potential energies of compounds. Stoppard takes these concepts and exploresRead MoreThe Effect Of Temperature On Human Body2068 Words   |  9 PagesThermodynamics as a field has many applications- everything from calculating the efficiency of an engine, determining the partial pressures of gas in a reaction to calculating the amount of energy required for a reaction to occur. These fore mentioned calculations can be used to do the same for the human body. The natural processes of the human body revolve around energy. Each system within the body contributes to the energetics of the human body; the digestive system converts food to energy thatRead MoreMotivation Letter And Research Objectives Essay1506 Words   |  7 Pagesstrategies adopted earlier in life helped me succeed not only to prepare myself for the exam, but also provided an opportunity to start teaching English language, mathematics and physics in a private educational institute. I was first introduced to Renewable Energy in Engineering faculty of Kabul University (EFKU). I took Thermodynamics, Electrical Circuits and Machines, Engineering Management and Project Management classes, in these classes I got the highest score among the classmates and it was becauseRead MoreBig Bang Theory vs. Creationism1760 Words   |  8 Pagesstates the universe was created out of nothing since nothing existed before the singularity. This idea, however, violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, which states that matter cannot be created nor destroyed (Strickland, 2008). The continuing formation of stars and galaxies also goes against scientific thinking that can be found in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law of entropy suggests that systems of change become less organized over time, which is not the theory presented by scientists concerningRead MoreDesign Of An Integrated Circuit9821 Words   |  40 Pagesactive, were placed over a piece of semi-conductive material ( Germanium piece) that was half the size of a paper clip. The success of this element (called chip due to its small size) containing a few transistors, resistors, and capacitors, led to the Physics Nobel Prize for its inventor in 2000. The design of an integrated circuit involves a development plan, where its functional characteristics and performance will define the elaboration of the logic circuit diagram. Once the diagram is finished, a seriesRead MoreKkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk6406 Words   |  26 Pagesselection, packaging, and manufacturing constraints. AUTO 533. Advanced Energy Solutions* (cross-listed with MECHENG 433) Prerequisite: MECHENG 235. I (3 credits) Introduction to the challenges of power generation for a global society using the thermodynamics to understand basic principles and technology limitations. Covers current and future demands for energy; methods of power generation including fossil fuel, solar, wind and nuclear; associated detrimental by-products; and advanced strategies to

Political Conservatism and the Role of Religion

Quite often, those on the left of the political spectrum dismiss political conservative ideology as the product of religious fervor. At first blush, this makes sense. After all, the conservative movement is populated by people of faith. Christians, Evangelicals, and Catholics tend to embrace the key aspects of conservatism, which include limited government, fiscal discipline, free enterprise, a strong national defense, and traditional family values. This is why many conservative Christians side with Republicanism politically. The Republican Party is most associated with championing these conservative values. Members of the Jewish faith, on the other hand, tend to drift toward the Democratic party because history supports it, not because of a particular ideology. According to author and essayist Edward S. Shapiro in American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia, most Jews are descendants of central and Eastern Europe, whose liberal parties -- in contrast to right-wing opponents -- favored Jewish emancipation and the lifting of economic and social restrictions on Jews. As a result, Jews looked to the Left for protection. Along with the rest of their traditions, Jews inherited a left-wing bias after emigrating to the United States, Shapiro says. Russell Kirk, in his book, The Conservative Mind, writes that, with the exception of antisemitism, The traditions of race and religion, the Jewish devotion to family, old usage, and spiritual continuity all incline the Jew toward conservatism. Shapiro says Jewish affinity for the left was cemented in the 1930s when Jews enthusiastically supported Franklin D. Roosevelts New Deal. They believed that the New Deal had succeeded in alleviating the social and economic conditions in which antisemitism flourished and, in the election of 1936, Jews supported Roosevelt by a ratio of nearly 9 to 1. While its fair to say that most conservatives use faith as a guiding principle, most try to keep it out of political discourse, recognizing it as something intensely personal. Conservatives often will say that the Constitution guarantees its citizens freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. In fact, there is plenty of historical evidence that proves, despite Thomas Jeffersons famous quote about a wall of separation between church and state, the Founding Fathers expected religion and religious groups to play an important role in the development of the nation. The religion clauses of the First Amendment guarantee the free exercise of religion, while at the same time protecting the nations citizens from religious oppression. The religion clauses also ensure that the federal government cannot be overtaken by one particular religious group because Congress cannot legislate one way or another on an establishment of religion. This precludes a national religion but also prevents the government from interfering with religions of any kind. For contemporary conservatives, the rule of thumb is that practicing faith publicly is reasonable, but proselytizing in public is not.

John Marshall Free Essays

John Marshall, whose most notable political role of Chief Justice of the United States, played a major role in defining the American legal system, he was also known as one of the best Chief Justices that ever lived. For 34 years as Chief Justice, Marshall made significant contributions to the development of the U. S. We will write a custom essay sample on John Marshall or any similar topic only for you Order Now Constitution through his high profile Supreme Court cases, such as Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohen’s v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden. These Supreme Court cases and others were approaches to help bring more federal structure to the U. S. Constitution. Marshall’s thirst for political knowledge at an early age, his contribution the judicial system, and dedication to political reform make him one of the most influential figures in American history. Early Life John Marshall, one of fifteen children, was born on September 24, 1755 in a log cabin in rural Germantown, Virgina. His parents were Thomas and Mary Marshall, who had significant status among the citizens of Germantown. Although Marshall’s parents were not formally educated, they ensured their children had a good, quality education. Marshall was homeschooled and often supplemented his reading from books in George Washington’s library. Marshall’s father and George Washington worked together as surveyors and became close friends. Washington would later become one of Marshall’s greatest heroes. Desiring their son to become a lawyer, Thomas and Mary sent Marshall to William and Mary College where he spent several weeks listening to George Wythe’s lectures on law, which was Marshall’s only means of formal education. At the age of 25, Marshall left William and Mary College and pursued a lawyer’s position in Germantown, where he later met and married his wife of 49 years, Mary Willis Ambler. Together, they had ten children, with only six living to see adulthood (McGill, 2005). Chief Justice Chief Justice John Marshall served in the Supreme Court from 1801-1835. He was the fourth Chief Justice appointed by President John Adams (Smith, 1996). Marshall was known as one of the greatest chief justices in judicial history. While head of court, Marshall helped establish foundations for the Supreme Court and the constitutional supremacy. Alexander M. Bickel, a sophisticated, constitutional scholar stated that John Marshall was one of the greatest justices due to his decision in the Marbury v. Madison case. Although Marshall is known for many other cases throughout judicial history, including McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohen’s v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogde, the high profile case, Marbury v. Madison, became one of Marshall’s most significant cases and one that established him as one of the greatest supreme court justices who ever lived (Wood, 1997). Marbury V. Madison In Marbury V. Madison, Marshall worked the Judiciary’s claim to apply the law of the constitution exactly the way that courts interpret common law and statues in their role of legal disputes. Marshall was instrumental in laying down the foundation for the rise of the Judiciary. Their goal was to make the Judiciary as one of the top three capital powers of the government. Marshall stated that the constitution was â€Å"a rule for the government of courts, as well as of his legislature†. As he made the issue known, judges could not ignore it. They were duty bound to enforce it by disallowing laws offensive to the constitution. At the time, many Americans had no trouble thinking of constitutions as law but not the kind of law that would be operated in the court system, but John Marshall stated towards the court system, by applying his methods of statutory interpretation to the constitution, he legalized it. He made it amenable to routine exposition and makes it happen. Marshall knew the Judiciary system would always be one of the weakest branches; its effectiveness depended on gaining the agreements of the legislative, executive branches, and of the people. The power that the Supreme Court would enjoy is the ability to persuade the people. Marshall was perfect for the job, and he greatly enhanced that power by his ability of persuasions. The American’s didn’t know anything about the constitution, but Marshall enhanced the knowledge pertaining to the constitution (Hobson, 2002). It is no doubt that John Marshall has made tremendous contributions to the judicial system. His thirst for knowledge at a young age and his political leadership has provided significant contributions to political society. It has been over two-hundred years since Marshall’s appointment; however, the Supreme Court still continues to honor him and his works. Marshall left a legacy that will be admired and written about by political generations to come. Through his works, Marshall helped define our country to what it is today as supported by political author, Jean Edward Smith who stated, â€Å"if George Washington found the country, John Marshall defined it† (Smith, 1996). How to cite John Marshall, Papers

Reputation in the Crucible free essay sample

Reputation is the estimation or name of being, having, having done, something specified by the general opinion of either a private or public group of people. In Arthur Miller’s screenplay, The Crucible, Miller presents his opinions on the factual truth of the Salem Witch Trials. Various events in Arthur Miller’s screenplay reveal the theme of reputation as being a leading force in the developing plotlines of the story. By doing this, he brings a whole new point of view to the readers of his screenplay. Reputation was extremely important at the time, as in a town like Salem where social standing was tied to one’s ability to follow religious rules. If you had a good reputation, you were more likely to be an upright member of the church and a good Christian. In Puritan times being religious and following the rules of God meant everything. The reputations of many characters in the crucible including Abigail, John Proctor and Reverend Parris were defined by the many actions and dialogues throughout the play, the Crucible. We will write a custom essay sample on Reputation in the Crucible or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page A dialogue from Abigail reveals Arthur Millers’ insights on the role of reputation in the society of Salem. Abigail states, I want to open myself! I want the light of God; I want the sweet love of Jesus! I danced for the Devil; I saw him, I wrote in his book; I go back to Jesus; I kiss His hand. I saw Sarah Good with the Devil! I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil! (Miller Act I) This quote from Abigail raises her position in society. By Abigail, doing this, the other girls follow; believing this will raise them also in the social ranking of their society. After hearing Tituba confess to witchcraft, Abigail sees this as an opportunity to get herself out of the spotlight, even though she was with the other girls in the forest. After clearing her name, she wanted to move the blame on, she starts accusing falsely the other people of being witches. When this was done, the other girls followed because of the success she had. These girls all cared about their reputation. With their reputation, they believe it is a way out from being trailed as a witch, as everyone else in Salem wishes to do. Abigail caused enough trouble in the court room ruining others reputations in order to save her own, but at the same time risks her own reputation. John Proctor, a farmer who lives outside the town had an affair with Abigail who is just a teenager early on in the screenplay, and is frightened to expose such a thing; he is afraid his name will be ruined. Earlier on in the play, Proctor has a chance to put a stop to the girls being accused of witchcraft; instead he sought to preserve his reputation from testifying against Abigail and revealing his scandalous affair. Towards the end of the play The Crucible, Proctors desire to keep and maintain his good name; leads him to make a courageous choice, by not giving into a faulty confession which leads to his death. Proctor says to Danforth, â€Å"I have given you my soul; leave me my name! † (Miller Act IV) This quote shows that by Proctor refusing to give up or surrender his name and reputation, he redeems himself for his earlier failure and dies with integrity. John Proctor confirms his decision saying to himself in Act IV that he has given his soul and wants to at least keep his name. Proctor gives his last orders as to not destroy his name, because his name means so much to him. He would rather die than live with the rest of the town knowing that he was convicted of seeing the devil and being a witch. In Act II, Proctor says to Putnam, â€Å"You cannot command Mr. Parris. We vote by name in this society, not by acreage. † This quote demonstrates what a big role a person’s name in the society brings to the rest of the town of Salem. Acreage, money or land is usually a way to critique a person, but in Salem, someone’s name or part in society is what they are held as in the eyes of the people. If you have a good reputation then you stand high in the town, but if your reputation is bad and you are convicted of being a witch, that could damage your reputation and status severely. In Act II, Parris says, â€Å"Abigail, I have fought here three long years to bend these stiff-necked people to me, and now, just now when some good respect is rising for me in the parish, you compromise my very character. I have given you a home, child, I have put clothes upon your back- now give me upright answer. Your name in the town- it is entirely white, is it not? This quote proves that once Parris’s authority started to increase, Abigail, his niece had to start trouble, causing many people to look at Parris differently and, causing his power in the society to decrease. Reputation led the Crucible’s many characters to resort to various actions and lies to retain their own character. The pressure of society put forth on the characters, caused a chain reaction of lie and deceit that caused the death of many people. The screenplay the Crucible, was therefore wrought with the theme of reputation as a leading factor in the development of the plotline and story.